From 60db0ebac4b7345c17e28832ddfbe1c7ccaf42e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Thorin-Oakenpants Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2024 03:29:25 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] remove confusing comment > serviceWorkers require an "Allow" permission I made this change as part of v103 (after we finally migrated off lifetime cookie policy), but I cannot for the life of me work out why I mentioned SWers needing an allow permission - there is no such thing in ctrl-I or under privacy> permissions. (I checked ESR102, and current) If anyone can enlighten me, speak up --- user.js | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/user.js b/user.js index 07c0682..fb2d926 100644 --- a/user.js +++ b/user.js @@ -665,9 +665,8 @@ user_pref("privacy.clearOnShutdown_v2.historyFormDataAndDownloads", true); // [F /** SANITIZE ON SHUTDOWN: RESPECTS "ALLOW" SITE EXCEPTIONS FF103+ | v2 migration is FF128+ ***/ /* 2815: set "Cookies" and "Site Data" to clear on shutdown (if 2810 is true) [SETUP-CHROME] - * [NOTE] Exceptions: A "cookie" block permission also controls "offlineApps" (see note below). - * serviceWorkers require an "Allow" permission. For cross-domain logins, add exceptions for - * both sites e.g. https://www.youtube.com (site) + https://accounts.google.com (single sign on) + * [NOTE] Exceptions: A "cookie" block permission also controls "offlineApps" (see note below). For cross-domain logins, + * add exceptions for both sites e.g. https://www.youtube.com (site) + https://accounts.google.com (single sign on) * [NOTE] "offlineApps": Offline Website Data: localStorage, service worker cache, QuotaManager (IndexedDB, asm-cache) * [NOTE] "sessions": Active Logins (has no site exceptions): refers to HTTP Basic Authentication [1], not logins via cookies * [WARNING] Be selective with what sites you "Allow", as they also disable partitioning (1767271)